Note: Karen Turgut was originally convicted of the offences below in her absence at Brighton Magistrates’ Court on 5 July. She subsequently completed a statutory declaration at Bromley Magistrates’ Court in August that she had not been aware of the proceedings. The court quashed the original conviction and sent the case back to Brighton Magistrates’ Court for re-hearing. Ms Turgut was aware of this, but she did not attend the new hearing and was again convicted in her absence, on 6 September.
The former office manager of a company at the centre of a multi-million pound scam inquiry has been convicted of refusing to provide information relevant to the investigation.
Karen Turgut worked at Friendly Pensions Ltd, which is the subject of an investigation by The Pensions Regulator (TPR) in connection with a suspected £13.75 million scam.
Ms Turgut, of Bromley, Kent, refused to give information to TPR and failed to supply documents, despite being required to by law.
She was ordered to pay more than £6,000 at Brighton Magistrates’ Court after being convicted of refusing to provide information and documents required under section 72 of the Pensions Act 2004 without a reasonable excuse.
The case is the third criminal conviction secured by TPR.
TPR staff wanted Ms Turgut to answer questions and hand over documents about the activities of Friendly Pensions, specifically about emails she had sent and received while working there.
She was asked to assist the investigation voluntarily, but when she failed to respond she was served with a notice requiring her to provide information to TPR. The notice – known as a section 72 notice – warned that failing to comply with it would be a criminal offence. Ms Turgut still refused to co-operate, without giving a good reason.
Ms Turgut did not attend Brighton Magistrates’ Court for the hearing on Wednesday 6 September. The court tried her in her absence and she was convicted of one offence of refusing to provide information and one offence of refusing to produce documents required under section 72 of the Pensions Act 2004 without a reasonable excuse, contrary to section 77 of the Act.
The magistrates ordered her to pay a £5,280 fine, £800 costs and a £170 victim surcharge.
Ms Turgut continues to be in breach of the section 72 notice. TPR can bring further criminal proceedings, with the threat of further fines, until she complies.
- TPR has the power under section 72 of the Pensions Act 2004 to require pension schemes, employers and third parties to provide us with information and documents relevant to our statutory functions.
- Failure to provide such information is a criminal offence which can result in an unlimited fine. Additionally, those involved can suffer serious reputational damage from being successfully prosecuted for non-compliance with the law. Businesses could also face further action from their professional body.
- TPR is the regulator of work-based pension schemes in the UK. Our statutory objectives are: to protect members’ benefits; to reduce the risk of calls on the Pension Protection Fund (PPF); to promote, and to improve understanding of, the good administration of work-based pension schemes; to maximise employer compliance with automatic enrolment duties; and to minimise any adverse impact on the sustainable growth of an employer (in relation to the exercise of the regulator’ s functions under Part 3 of the Pensions Act 2004 only).
James GloverSenior Media Officer