Competitive tendering evaluation
FOI reference - FOI-106
Date - 18 April 2023
Request
You have requested the following information:
“For any last ten tenders awarded through competitive tendering in the last two years that were evaluated separately on price and quality, please provide the scores of all evaluated bidders for both price and quality, as a proportion of the total possible score for each category. Bidders need not be named.”
Response
I confirm that we hold the information you have requested.
Procurement 1
| Supplier | Total Technical (Quality) |
Total Commercial (Price) |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier 1 | 38.60% | 24.69% | 63.29% |
| Supplier 2 | 51.00% | 25.00% | 76.00% |
| Supplier 3 | 51.00% | 24.34% | 75.34% |
| Supplier 4 | 44.70% | 24.96% | 69.66% |
Procurement 2
| Technical score % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenderer | (Quality) | Price Score % |
Total Score% |
Final Ranking |
| Supplier 1 | 69.40 | 16.15 | 85.55 | 1 |
| Supplier 2 | 50.00 | 20.00 | 70.00 | 2 |
| Supplier 3 | 57.40 | 10.79 | 68.19 | 3 |
| Supplier 4 | 52.00 | 3.18 | 55.18 | 4 |
| Supplier 5 | 36.00 | 11.64 | 47.64 | 5 |
Procurement 3
| Supplier | Total Technical (Quality) |
Total Commercial (Price) |
Grand Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier 1 | 6.00% | 12.47% | 18.47% |
| Supplier 2 | 40.00% | 60.00% | 100.00% |
Procurement 4
| Supplier | Total Technical (Quality) |
Total Commercial (Price) |
Total | Total Presentation (Quality) |
Grand Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier 1 | 51.00% | 13.60% | 64.60% | 16.00% | 80.60% |
| Supplier 2 | 46.00% | 9.87% | 55.87% | 12.00% | 67.87% |
| Supplier 3 | 46.00% | 7.81% | 53.81% | 8.00% | 61.81% |
| Supplier 4 | 33.00% | 20.00% | 53.00% | ||
| Supplier 5 | 39.00% | 13.63% | 52.63% | ||
| Supplier 6 | 40.00% | 6.68% | 46.68% | ||
| Supplier 7 | 39.00% | 5.25% | 44.25% | ||
| Supplier 8 | 38.00% | 5.02% | 43.02% | ||
| Supplier 9 | 29.00% | 12.73% | 41.73% | ||
| Supplier 10 | 23.00% | 16.04% | 39.04% |
Procurement 5
| Supplier | Total Technical (Quality) |
Total Commercial (Price) |
Grand Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier 1 | 32.00% | 60.00% | 92.00% |
| Supplier 2 | 29.00% | 1.84% | 30.84% |
| Supplier 3 | 23.00% | 5.90% | 28.90% |
| Supplier4 | 23.00% | 1.22% | 24.22% |
Procurement 6
| Evaluation Criteria |
Total Technical (Quality) |
Total Commercial (Price) |
Grand Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier 1 | 58% | 14% | 72% |
| Supplier 2 | 42% | 14% | 56% |
| Supplier 3 | 72% | 20% | 92% |
| Supplier 4 | 50% | 14% | 64% |
| Supplier 5 | 51% | 13% | 64% |
Procurement 7
| Supplier | Total Technical (Quality) |
Total Commercial (Price) |
Total Presentation (Quality) |
Grand Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier 1 | 45.00% | 40.00% | 6.00% | 91.00% |
| Supplier 2 | 27.00% | 19.43% | 8.00% | 54.43% |
Procurement 8
| Supplier | Total Technical (Quality) |
Total Commercial (Price) |
Total Presentation (Quality) |
Grand Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier 1 | 42.00% | 30.50% | 6.00% | 78.50% |
| Supplier 2 | 30.00% | 40.00% | 8.00% | 78.00% |
| Supplier 3 | 38.00% | 31.55% | 8.00% | 77.55% |
Procurement 9
| Supplier | Total Technical (Quality) |
Total Commercial (Price) |
Grand Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier 1 | 32.00% | 49.06% | 81.06% |
| Supplier 2 | 20.00% | 60.00% | 80.00% |
| Supplier 3 | 32.00% | 37.63% | 69.63% |
| Supplier 4 | 23.00% | 42.45% | 65.45% |
| Supplier 5 | 32.00% | 29.00% | 61.00% |
| Supplier 6 | 31.00% | 28.04% | 59.04% |
| Supplier 7 | 20.00% | 20.82% | 40.82% |
Procurement 10
| Evaluation criteria | Weighting | Supplier 1 | Supplier 2 | Supplier 3 | Supplier 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical (Quality) weighted score | 70% | 42.00 | 37.00 | 49.00 | 56.00 |
| Price weighted score | 30% | 23.65 | 30.00 | 24.33 | 27.15 |
| Total weighted score | 100% | 65.65 | 67.00 | 73.33 | 83.15 |
| Overall ranking | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |